<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RPCB Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rpcb.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Blog of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of Boothwyn</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on God&#8217;s Glory in Creation by rpcb</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/gods-glory-in-creation/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>rpcb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/gods-glory-in-creation/#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Thank you Pauline, you're absolutely correct - God's greatness is readily seen by the enormity of His creation.  I don't experience &#38; enjoy it as frequently as I should, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Pauline, you&#8217;re absolutely correct - God&#8217;s greatness is readily seen by the enormity of His creation.  I don&#8217;t experience &amp; enjoy it as frequently as I should, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on God&#8217;s Glory in Creation by pauline mwarabu</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/gods-glory-in-creation/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>pauline mwarabu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/01/gods-glory-in-creation/#comment-658</guid>
		<description>this is wonderful work. Christians need to realize the integrity of the creation and also the greatness of God potrayed by the enormity of His creation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is wonderful work. Christians need to realize the integrity of the creation and also the greatness of God potrayed by the enormity of His creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infant Baptism by black_mamba</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>black_mamba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Is this gonna Kill You? No i Dont Think so !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this gonna Kill You? No i Dont Think so !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infant Baptism by theologian</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>theologian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-381</guid>
		<description>This brings up something interesting. Are we to set a limit on when one can baptize the youth, or are they to be baptized as long as they are still under their parents authority? I can't see a biblical or historical reason for allowing infants but not allowing children our teens to be baptized. It appears that the only qualification is that they are part of a believing household, not age.

Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This brings up something interesting. Are we to set a limit on when one can baptize the youth, or are they to be baptized as long as they are still under their parents authority? I can&#8217;t see a biblical or historical reason for allowing infants but not allowing children our teens to be baptized. It appears that the only qualification is that they are part of a believing household, not age.</p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infant Baptism by rpcb</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>rpcb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>After a quick scan of my materials on the topic of baptism, I did not find any historical references to children ages 6-8 being baptized.  My materials provide historical examples of the baptism of infants - but not the young children you specifically reference.

I concur with you that this is a right &#38; proper application of the doctrine - especially the outworking of the covenant.

One source I do not have that you may wish to research is James W. Dale's Christic and Patristic Baptism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a quick scan of my materials on the topic of baptism, I did not find any historical references to children ages 6-8 being baptized.  My materials provide historical examples of the baptism of infants - but not the young children you specifically reference.</p>
<p>I concur with you that this is a right &amp; proper application of the doctrine - especially the outworking of the covenant.</p>
<p>One source I do not have that you may wish to research is James W. Dale&#8217;s Christic and Patristic Baptism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infant Baptism by Preacher Man</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Preacher Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post. I'm doing some research on infant baptism and found your site. Here's a question. What historical evidence is there that baptism should include young children as well as infants? Most Presbyterians will baptize children as old as six, seven, or eight years old as "infants." I think this is right and a proper application of the doctrine, but is there any historical evidence that the Reformer, Puritans or others did this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post. I&#8217;m doing some research on infant baptism and found your site. Here&#8217;s a question. What historical evidence is there that baptism should include young children as well as infants? Most Presbyterians will baptize children as old as six, seven, or eight years old as &#8220;infants.&#8221; I think this is right and a proper application of the doctrine, but is there any historical evidence that the Reformer, Puritans or others did this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infant Baptism by theologian</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>theologian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Josh,

I was going to let Dwight answer this, but he is probably too busy.

My assumption is that the series is not done yet. Dwight is very busy, so i will be trying to fill in the gaps between his posts with stuff that i find interesting...like a huge post on infant baptism :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>I was going to let Dwight answer this, but he is probably too busy.</p>
<p>My assumption is that the series is not done yet. Dwight is very busy, so i will be trying to fill in the gaps between his posts with stuff that i find interesting&#8230;like a huge post on infant baptism <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infant Baptism by Kymanika</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Kymanika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 22:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Is the Valley of Vision series over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Valley of Vision series over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infant Baptism by Kymanika</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Kymanika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>:(   I like series for two reasons. 1.) as a reader, they make me come back to the blog and 2.) as a blogger, it keeps a library of material handy. I usually have a few posts in queue that I am working on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   I like series for two reasons. 1.) as a reader, they make me come back to the blog and 2.) as a blogger, it keeps a library of material handy. I usually have a few posts in queue that I am working on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Infant Baptism by theologian</title>
		<link>http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>theologian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpcb.wordpress.com/2006/12/26/infant-baptism/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>To tell you the truth, you will rarely see me doing a series. I don't really like posting in a series. I don't mind reading other bloggers who do a series, i just don't like posting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To tell you the truth, you will rarely see me doing a series. I don&#8217;t really like posting in a series. I don&#8217;t mind reading other bloggers who do a series, i just don&#8217;t like posting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
